Purported Triassic angiosperms

Homepage

Mono/ Polyphyletic
origins

Terrestrial/ Aquatic
origins

Euanthial/
palaeoherb?

Purported Triassic
angiosperms

Mid Cretaceous
radiation

Environmental
considerations

Coevolution with
insects

Coevolution with
dinosaurs

In the 1970s there was a rush to find angiosperms that were older than the Mid Cretaceous fossils. None of these discoveries was wholly convincing. However, current phylogenetic evidence suggests a deep split between angiosperms and gymnosperms, so it is not impossible that angiosperm fossils might be identified from the Triassic (250-200 Mya).

Many purported angiosperm precursors have been singled out because of net veins in leaves, a form that has arisen several times independently in different clades. Furcula is one candidate: its leaves are net-veined: a forked midrib, with secondary veins coming off it with intercostal veins between these that form a reticulate pattern.

Clues for discovering the true origin of angiospermy may be found in a plant group that can be considered to be a living fossil...

How palaeoecology of the Triassic may have led to the evolution of angiosperms

The Triassic saw the demise of the great supercontient Pangaea,the single global landmass. The Earth was slowly drying. There were no polar icecaps. The ground was dominated by ferns, while conifers and tree-ferns made up the forests. Cycads and ginkgos (both gymnosperms) were increasing in importance. On land, the main animals were archosaurs, a reptile group that led to dinosaurs in the Late Triassic

Pangaea began to break up in the Triassic, with flooding of the continents occurring as the prolonged dry spell of the Permo-Triassic ended. Seasonal weather patterns took hold through the Jurassic and Cretaceous.

5globes.gif

Text Box: The continental arrangement during the Permian and the Triassic, showing the change from Pangaea to Laurasia and Gondwanaland that caused such ecological havoc.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/publications/text/historical.html

First discovered in 1956, Sanmiguelia was something of a surprise. It appeared to show a combination of dicot and monocot characteristics, but with the appearance of a palm. The surprise was the age of the sediments in which the remains were found: they were Triassic.

Sanmig-3.jpg (53369 bytes)

Unfortunately, the remains were not in good enough condition to prove its affiliations, so the Cretaceous origination theory of angiosperms held. Then, in 1977, another Sanmiguelia fossil was discovered. This time, it was in much better condition, and whole, with roots,leaves, stems and most excitingly of all, structures resembling flowers. However, the fossil is still controversial; its affiliations to gnetales are still under debate, and thus the Cretaceous/Triassic argument rages on.

Text Box: Right: A reconstruction of Sanmiguelia based on the 1980 discovery by Cornet et al. http://bcornet.tripod.com/evoltheo/Slewisii.htm

Triassic angiosperm-like pollen: Even if the macroplant fossils such as Sanmiguelia are debated, distinctive angiosperm-like pollen grains have been reported from the Newark Supergroup of eastern North America, in sediments of Carnian age (Late Triassic, some 228 million years ago).

The pollen was placed in the Crinopolles group. It was found with many other intermediate forms, between ginkgo pollen and angiosperm-like pollen, so the Carnian might represent an explosively experimental period. The Carnian angiosperm-like plant that produced the pollen might have failed to survive because of its rarity. It made up less than 2% of the palynoflora. One of its key characteristics is that it has many apertures, that key angiosperm feature. Under the evolutionary pressure of the time, however, those with a single aperture survived more easily and prevailed until the genes resurfaced in the Cretaceous. Wolfe et al. (1989) have suggested that angiospermy evolved early on and then disappeared from evolutionary view for some time.