Coevolution of angiosperms and insects
|
Homepage
Purported Triassic
|
One of the reasons for the massive diversity of angiosperms today is that they
evolved an extraordinary mechanism for dispersing their genes. Insects have long been allied closely to plants, and it may be that angiosperms radiated so rapidly because of their association with specific insect pollinators. Cretaceous flowers often show features associated today with insect pollination: stamens with small anthers and low pollen production (minimising pollen waste), pollen grains often covered with a pollenkitt-like material which are larger than those adapted to wind dispersal. There is one distinct advantage of insect pollination: the spread of genetic material over a wide area; something which wind-pollinated plants cannot achieve to the same extent. Insect pollination of flowers probably began with insects feeding on the plants they later came to work for, leading us to expect bite marks on early plants. Fossil evidence, however, is ambiguous: the records of insect feeding behaviour do not particularly coincide with the angiosperm radiation.
To further analyse the possibility of coevolution, we can study extant pollinator behaviour. One of the problems faced with the pollination of flowers is that there is a conflict of interest between the flowers and the animals. It is in the plant’s interest for the pollinator to travel between widely spaced individuals, so pollen is transferred to a distantly related plant. However, the pollinator should favour a mixed diet, unless one type of flower provides a much higher reward than any other.
|
The two diagrams below show the organisms believed to have particularly influenced the Mid-Cretaceous radiation.
![]() |
![]() |
Aspects of the flower that may have coevolved
Scent: A far-reaching method of communication between plants and their
pollinators. Insects have a number of uses for fragrances from plants: distance
judgement, approaching, locating the best spot to land and to feed. Scent
molecules are simple and small, and all volatile to a point.
Colour: Different pollinators respond differently to colour. Insects
respond to long wavelengths of blue and ultraviolet, whereas birds, like humans,
are more responsive to bright reds. Plants use colouration for two methods of transport:
for pollen and for seeds. Flowers are coloured specifically for their
pollinators. A plant that will predominantly be pollinated by birds
will have bright reds and oranges, while insects will pollinate
purples, blues and whites more readily. Different coloured lines and patterns
on the flowers also serve as landing strips for insects, directing them
immediately to the nectar reward.
Fruit: Fruit is generally fed upon by larger animals than insects, and is
coloured for the eye of the disperser. Berries eaten by birds are generally
red or black, and will change colour to signal this fact: an unripe berry will
be an unappetising green colour. Animals swiftly learn which colours are good
to eat: it is in the interests of plants to attract fruit-eaters only when their
seeds are ready to be transported.
Mimicry: Some flowers mimic objects that might be attractive to their
potential pollinators. Famously, some flowers look like, and even smell like,
females of different insect species, and males insects are inevitably attracted.
Illustration of the differences in pollen exine structure, Doyle (1978),
http://www.unifiedworlds.com/cornet/Why02/why.htm
It is astonishing to imagine how this kind of reproductive mimicry might have
arisen. Probably a
particular flower had a part that looked faintly similar to a female, or a
particular scent similar to a female pheromone. The insect attempted
copulation, pollen was attached and deposited when the insect moved to the next
plant of the same species. Over generations of plants this mimicry was refined
until it became the amazing trickery it is today.
